Search Suggest

SQL Server, the Predicate and the Residual Predicate property of the Execution Plan

Hi Guys,

Welcome to this blog! This time we will talk about the predicate and the residual predicate.

Are you sure you know everything? ...otherwise you should invest a few minutes to read this post!

We will use the Management Studio (SSMS) to take a look at the execution plan of which, as usual, we always try to learn something new. 

So..

Enjoy the reading mate!

 

Predicate and the Residual Predicate

This time we start by in this way!

Suppose we have a table: a table with a field ID integer and with an identity. 
The Id field is also the primary key.

The same table has a datedoc field in datetime format and a field customer_name of type Varchar.


CREATE TABLE ORDTES ( ID INT identity(1,1) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ,
DATEDOC datetime,
CUSTOMER_NAME varchar(80)

We have used this structure many times in previous posts.

Now suppose we need to search for a row of this table by datedoc and then by customer_name.

If this search has to be repeated often it might be useful to dedicate an index to this query.

We have these possibility:

  • Create a non clustered index on the DATEDOC field
  • Create a non clustered index on the DATEDOC field with include on the CUSTOMER_NAME field
  • Create a non clustered index on both the fields: DATEDOC and CUSTOMER_NAME.

Let's populate the table with some data and then try, one by one, the three indexes to see how the data is extracted.


WITH CTE AS (
SELECT 1 AS Numb
UNION ALL
SELECT a.Numb + 1
FROM CTE a
WHERE a.Numb < 100000
)
INSERT INTO
ORDTES(DATEDOC, CUSTOMER_NAME)
SELECT
CASE
WHEN ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (ORDER BY Numb) < 10000 THEN '2022-05-12'
    ELSE '2022-05-11'
END,
CASE
WHEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER BY Numb) % 5 = 0 THEN 'Luke'
WHEN ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (ORDER BY Numb) % 5 = 1 THEN 'Paul'
    WHEN ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (ORDER BY Numb) % 5 = 2 THEN 'Itzik'
    WHEN ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (ORDER BY Numb) % 5 = 3 THEN 'Priyanka'
    WHEN ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (ORDER BY Numb) % 5 = 4 THEN 'Rey'
    ELSE ''
END
FROM CTE
OPTION (MAXRECURSION 0)
 

In detail:

We have inserted 100.000 Rows.

10.000 out of 100.000 Rows have datedoc equal to 2022-05-12
90.000 out of 100.000 Rows have datedoc equal to 2022-05-11
 
20.000 out of 100.000 Rows have customer equal to 'Luke'
each other customer name have 20.000 out of 100.000 Rows.

The Query is this:


SELECT DATEDOC,
CUSTOMER_NAME FROM ORDTES
WHERE DATEDOC >= '2022-05-12 00:00:00.000' AND DATEDOC <= '2022-05-12 00:00:00.000'
AND CUSTOMER_NAME = 'Luke'
 

 

The first index

 

The first index is:


CREATE INDEX Ordtes_datedoc ON
ORDTES(DATEDOC)

Execute now the query and take a look to the execution plan:


The index in the DATEDOC field is not used. Instead, the clustered index is used because the clustered index is the table itself sorted by the ID field.

This also happens because we would still have to go to the table to read the CUSTOMER_NAME field. This is the most advantageous way the optimizer has found.

You should note that the clustered index scan read all the rows of our table. This time we have 100.000 Rows.

 


 

Looking at the property windows above you will note taht the Predicate property appears

It is now easy to understand what the predicate property means.

The predicate acts as a filter for each of the 100.000 Row. 
The following two condictions have been tested:
  • DATEDOC >= '2022-05-12 00:00:00.000' AND DATEDOC <= '2022-05-12 00:00:00.000' 
  • CUSTOMERNAME = 'Luke'

If they are verified the record is returned otherwise it is discarded.

Simple isn't it?
 

The second index
 

The second index is:


CREATE INDEX ORDTES_DATEDOC_INCL_CUSTOMER_NAME ON ORDTES(DATEDOC) INCLUDE (CUSTOMER_NAME)

This time we added the CUSTORMER_NAME field in the INCLUDE clause.

The index cover every field of the query so it is a covering index: Most likely this index will be used.

 Look at the exection plan:


Yes the index is used:


 This time the index will read only 10.000 Rows and not 100.000!
 (10.000 out of 100.000 Rows have datedoc equal to 2022-05-12)

These  10.000 Rows will be returned directly from the index then ... whats happen?

We have a Predicate that this time is called Residual Predicate!

The residual predicate act as a filter.

For each of the 10.000 Rows, the condition on customer_name is checked to be true. 

At the end of the process 1.999 Rows will be returned, other 8001 Rows will not be returned.

It is not easy again?


Third index.

 
In the third index the customer_name field is not in the include. This is a composite index.


CREATE INDEX ORDTES_DATEDOC_CUSTOMER_NAME ON ORDTES(DATEDOC,
CUSTOMER_NAME)

Executing the Query the index is used:

This time this composite index will return the exact number of rows: 1999


Today we have seen what the predicate is and how it works

To sum up SQL Server is able to use an index to resolve a first predicate and iterate the same index to another field to resolve a second predicate.

 

That's all for today & Stay tuned for the next post!



If you are genuinely and truly interested in one of the products that appear in advertising ... click the adv from my blog to support my site! 

Or click the (    ) button







Previous post: SQL Server, Is a Seek Always Only a Seek? Singleton Lookup and Range Scan. Part 2 ...some other infos.

Post a Comment